26 Mar
2006
26 Mar
'06
4:04 p.m.
On Friday 24 March 2006 16:16, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
Daniel McAllansmith wrote:
I can see the domain bounds check would be a problem in theory, but in practice doesn't the type enforce that? Keeping Word positive costs nothing because it just overflows. Wouldn't it be much the same?
If you're planning wraparound semantics then you're better off with Int indexes.
I wasn't really _planning_ wrap around semantics. More just making the point that saying the cost of using Word is greater than the cost of using Int, due to the bounds checking required, seems unfair. I see your point about quick detection of bad indices, though I'd still rather have the type document the fact that only positive integers are expected. Daniel