
Seems xmonad is feeling the love. The attached mail turned up on the debian-user mailing list. It's high time xmonad gets packaged for Debian! /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus.therning@gmail.com http://therning.org/magnus

Nice spot, Magnus. We at xmonad.org aim to please :) People might be also interested in a bit of an experience report on developing xmonad (and running an open source Haskell project) I gave at Galois a couple of weeks ago: http://galois.com/~dons/talks/xmonad-galois-0907.pdf Finally, while we're here, an xmonad talk and demo will be happening at the Haskell Workshop next week in Freiburg, and there's bound to be some xmonad hacking/install fest during the Hackathon too: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hac_2007_II The talk outline: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/papers/haskell51d-stewart.pdf -- Don magnus:
Seems xmonad is feeling the love. The attached mail turned up on the debian-user mailing list. It's high time xmonad gets packaged for Debian!
/M
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:35:28 -0500 From: cothrige
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: efficiency of windows managers "Javier Vasquez"
writes: Don't know about windowMaker, but you might try:
fluxbox icewm pekwm fvwm2
You might find some pretty light, and some besides offering lots of fun and good looking features... I use fluxbox and a machine with 512M main, and 64M ati-rage is performing pretty well...
I know my choices may seem rather extreme by some, but if one is really seeking a lightweight wm I would suggest adding xmonad (with dzen2) to the above list. I have tried many small tools in this area, including ratpoison, ion3, and stumpwm, and xmonad is easily the fastest and has the smallest memory footprint I have found yet. As I have no experience with haskell compiling it was something of a learning experience, but it really wasn't too bad and has been more than worth it. It does just about everything I ever liked in ion3 (the next smallest IMHO), and all without Tuomo! :-)
Patrick

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 27.09.2007, 21:53 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
Seems xmonad is feeling the love. The attached mail turned up on the debian-user mailing list. It's high time xmonad gets packaged for Debian!
note that there is an Intend To Package filed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429226 But I wonder how to combine the idea of a binary package with the way xmonad gets configured. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner mail: mail@joachim-breitner.de | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Key: 4743206C JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

mail:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 27.09.2007, 21:53 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
Seems xmonad is feeling the love. The attached mail turned up on the debian-user mailing list. It's high time xmonad gets packaged for Debian!
note that there is an Intend To Package filed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429226
But I wonder how to combine the idea of a binary package with the way xmonad gets configured.
I'd just go with the defaults for now, in a binary package, with a mention to go an install it yourself if you want to edit the configuration. That, or use an extension that allows configuration via X defaults. Binary packaging is a bit of an open issue at the moment. -- Don
participants (3)
-
Don Stewart
-
Joachim Breitner
-
Magnus Therning