Re: Shootout favoring imperative code

6 Jan
2006
6 Jan
'06
8 p.m.
I sent a private email and the response to it has appeared on this mailing-list, so let me just correct some of the interpretations that have been made.
You can say that again!
Ah..sarcasm, I know that one.
No, it was emphatic agreement (the ordinary usage of that phrase).
Is a persecution complex required for Haskell programming :-)
This one is sarcasm. Hi Sebastian :-)
I'm waiting for the complaints that binary-trees was designed to favour functional programming languages ;-)
;-) == sarcasm
Actually no - binary-trees was written with functional programming languages very much in mind. best wishes, Isaac __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
7077
Age (days ago)
7077
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Isaac Gouy