Re: matrix computations based on the GSL
Is a matrix is a linear operation on a vector, does it not make sense to define matrix applicaion: mapply :: Matrix -> Vector -> Vector Then you can define say: rotate90 = mapply rotationMatrix90 v' = rotate90 v Keean.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Keean Schupke wrote:
Is a matrix is a linear operation on a vector,
It _is_ not a linear map, but it is a canonical representation of a linear map.
does it not make sense to define matrix applicaion:
mapply :: Matrix -> Vector -> Vector
Then you can define say:
rotate90 = mapply rotationMatrix90
v' = rotate90 v
... that's what I said about mulVec.
Henning Thielemann wrote:
does it not make sense to define matrix applicaion:
mapply :: Matrix -> Vector -> Vector
Then you can define say:
rotate90 = mapply rotationMatrix90
v' = rotate90 v
... that's what I said about mulVec.
I guess that means we agree... Keean.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Keean Schupke wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
does it not make sense to define matrix applicaion:
mapply :: Matrix -> Vector -> Vector
Then you can define say:
rotate90 = mapply rotationMatrix90
v' = rotate90 v
... that's what I said about mulVec.
I guess that means we agree...
... yes, and that I wonder if you read my former mails. I feel I'm repeating myself.
participants (2)
-
Henning Thielemann -
Keean Schupke