I see, that's some interesting history. The claim that Data.Sequence is faster than Data.Queue is wrong, though, as far as I can tell (see benchmark in repo), so maybe it was a mistake to remove from base if that really was the rationale. Are there any records of that conversation/decision? Also, a minor point - Data.Sequence only has amortized O(1) enqueue and dequeue, whereas Data.Queue has O(1) worst-case enqueue and dequeue.

It is the recommended public forum, according to: https://wiki.haskell.org/Taking_over_a_package On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:56:14AM -0500, Mitchell Rosen wrote:

Is this still the right place to make takeover requests?

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 7:30 PM Mitchell Rosen wrote:

...

I see, that's some interesting history. The claim that Data.Sequence is faster than Data.Queue is wrong, though, as far as I can tell (see benchmark in repo), so maybe it was a mistake to remove from base if that really was the rationale. Are there any records of that conversation/decision? Also, a minor point - Data.Sequence only has amortized O(1) enqueue and dequeue, whereas Data.Queue has O(1) worst-case enqueue and dequeue.

Great, thanks – I neglected to CC the original author though I did reach out via private correspondence. CC'ing now. On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:13 PM Francesco Ariis wrote:

Il 23 gennaio 2024 alle 11:56 Mitchell Rosen ha scritto:

...

Is this still the right place to make takeover requests?

It is, follow the recommended procedure

https://wiki.haskell.org/Taking_over_a_package

So put the current maintainer in CC, wait a while, then contact Hackage admins —F

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.