Language popularity

Yesterday I saw Haskell mentioned for the first time in a magazine, Bits & Chips. It is a magazine for professionals, about hardware and software; the article was about the domain specific language Cryptol from Galois. In the same issue of the magazine, there was an article saying that the company Tiobe has proclamed C the language of the year 2008, because of it's growth in popularity of almost two percent. The current statistics can befoud at [1]. The most popular functional language at the moment is LOGO [2], at the 15th place in the top 50 (from 22nd place a year ago). Haskell is at the 35th place (no indication of the score last year). A quick search in the Web Archive [3] reveals that Haskell was at the 41st place in the index in June 2007. My own research, using Google: Search Hits ------------------------------- Java programming 20.400.000 LOGO programming 14.600.000 Haskell programming 250.000 [1] http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_(programming_language) [3] http://web.archive.org/web/20070606231519/www.tiobe.com/?tiobe_index -- Regards, Henk-Jan van Tuyl -- http://functor.bamikanarie.com http://Van.Tuyl.eu/ --

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:52:48 +0100
"Henk-Jan van Tuyl"
Yesterday I saw Haskell mentioned for the first time in a magazine, Bits & Chips. It is a magazine for professionals, about hardware and software; the article was about the domain specific language Cryptol from Galois.
In the same issue of the magazine, there was an article saying that the company Tiobe has proclamed C the language of the year 2008, because of it's growth in popularity of almost two percent. The current statistics can befoud at [1]. The most popular functional language at the moment is LOGO [2], at the 15th place in the top 50 (from 22nd place a year ago).
I think we can fairly safely discount the commercial relevance of any language ranking which places LOGO so highly. It may be that a lot of people *know* LOGO (or claim to know it), but that does not mean that is used a lot for commercial programming. -- Robin

Robin Green wrote:
I think we can fairly safely discount the commercial relevance of any language ranking which places LOGO so highly.
It may be that a lot of people *know* LOGO (or claim to know it), but that does not mean that is used a lot for commercial programming.
If we discuss here about a new Haskell LOGO - does this also count as a hit for LOGO programming language?

"Henk-Jan van Tuyl"
My own research, using Google: Search Hits ------------------------------- Java programming 20.400.000 LOGO programming 14.600.000
I get about that number of hits googling for "logo programming" (without quotes). However, beyond the first 30 pages, most hits appear to refer to logo as in a graphical symbol representing an entity, rather than Logo the programming language. By this metric, the most popular language must be "links", with 37M hits. :-)
Haskell programming 250.000
-k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

Ketil Malde
"Henk-Jan van Tuyl"
writes: My own research, using Google: Search Hits ------------------------------- Java programming 20.400.000 LOGO programming 14.600.000
I get about that number of hits googling for "logo programming" (without quotes). However, beyond the first 30 pages, most hits appear to refer to logo as in a graphical symbol representing an entity, rather than Logo the programming language.
By this metric, the most popular language must be "links", with 37M hits. :-)
Does this imply that there's a huge CS industry on Java? -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.
participants (5)
-
Achim Schneider
-
Henk-Jan van Tuyl
-
Henning Thielemann
-
Ketil Malde
-
Robin Green