RE: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Non-technical Haskell question

| I also have a very small start on a "haskell for hackers" ("hackers" in | the non-evil sense) sort of document. One this doesn't ignore I/O as | "hard" or "unimportant". I/O in Haskell doesn't suck. It's just that a | lot of people in the community don't have it as a high priority, I | think. As a shameless plug, have you tried "Tackling the awkward squad?". Indeed I/O in Haskell doesn't suck. http://research.microsoft.com/%7Esimonpj/papers/marktoberdorf Simon

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| I also have a very small start on a "haskell for hackers" ("hackers" in | the non-evil sense) sort of document. One this doesn't ignore I/O as | "hard" or "unimportant". I/O in Haskell doesn't suck. It's just that a | lot of people in the community don't have it as a high priority, I | think.
As a shameless plug, have you tried "Tackling the awkward squad?". Indeed I/O in Haskell doesn't suck.
http://research.microsoft.com/%7Esimonpj/papers/marktoberdorf
Well I thought I had a good grasp of Haskell I/O, but I read that paper anyway and found many interesting things (exceptions and Concurrent Haskell are both new to me, and the FFI is something I've only touched on briefly). I'd recommend that to others struggling with the IO monad; I wish I'd read it three years ago! Thanks
participants (2)
-
Matthew Walton
-
Simon Peyton-Jones