
Is it me or the above package is not included in Hoogle? Cristiano

Hello Cristiano, Sunday, April 5, 2009, 12:05:02 AM, you wrote:
Is it me or the above package is not included in Hoogle?
afair, Neil, being windows user, includes only packages available for his own system there was a large thread a few months ago and many peoples voted for excluding any OS-specific packages at all since this decreases portability of code developed by Hoogle users :))) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Cristiano, ... there was a large thread a few months ago and many peoples voted for excluding any OS-specific packages at all since this decreases portability of code developed by Hoogle users :)))
Nice shot :D So how do I fork a new system process <portably>? Thank you folks. Cristiano

cristiano.paris:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
wrote: Hello Cristiano, ... there was a large thread a few months ago and many peoples voted for excluding any OS-specific packages at all since this decreases portability of code developed by Hoogle users :)))
Nice shot :D
So how do I fork a new system process <portably>? Thank you folks.
Isn't this the goal of the process package? http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/process -- Don

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Don Stewart
cristiano.paris: ... Isn't this the goal of the process package?
Hi Don, thank you for the reference. I saw System.Process but when I needed it I was in a hurry and having a UNIX background I googled for some snippet daemonizing a process which led me to the System.Process.Posix package. Yet, I was surprised not to find it in Hoogle as I thought it to be a comprehensive search engine. But I was wrong :D Thanks. Cristiano

Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Cristiano,
Sunday, April 5, 2009, 12:05:02 AM, you wrote:
Is it me or the above package is not included in Hoogle?
afair, Neil, being windows user, includes only packages available for his own system
there was a large thread a few months ago and many peoples voted for excluding any OS-specific packages at all since this decreases portability of code developed by Hoogle users :)))
Urm, I realize that was half in jest, but no. It just makes Hoogle less useful. If I need to fork, I need to fork, and no amount of sugarcoating is going to get around that. -- John

Hi
Is it me or the above package is not included in Hoogle?
afair, Neil, being windows user, includes only packages available for his own system
there was a large thread a few months ago and many peoples voted for excluding any OS-specific packages at all since this decreases portability of code developed by Hoogle users :)))
Urm, I realize that was half in jest, but no. It just makes Hoogle less useful. If I need to fork, I need to fork, and no amount of sugarcoating is going to get around that.
I was implementing full package support last weekend. With any luck, I'll manage to push the changes tonight. If not, I'll push them as soon as I get back from holiday (a week or so) Thanks Neil

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 14:31 +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi
Is it me or the above package is not included in Hoogle?
afair, Neil, being windows user, includes only packages available for his own system
there was a large thread a few months ago and many peoples voted for excluding any OS-specific packages at all since this decreases portability of code developed by Hoogle users :)))
Urm, I realize that was half in jest, but no. It just makes Hoogle less useful. If I need to fork, I need to fork, and no amount of sugarcoating is going to get around that.
I was implementing full package support last weekend. With any luck, I'll manage to push the changes tonight. If not, I'll push them as soon as I get back from holiday (a week or so)
Yay! jcc
participants (7)
-
Bulat Ziganshin
-
Cristiano Paris
-
Cristiano Paris
-
Don Stewart
-
John Goerzen
-
Jonathan Cast
-
Neil Mitchell