Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why purely in haskell?
11 Jan
2008
11 Jan
'08
5:12 a.m.
As GNU is not Unix, NaN is not a number,
Since NaN /= NaN, I think, we should decipher "NaN" as "Not a NaN" instead.
6343
Age (days ago)
6343
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Miguel Mitrofanov