Fwd: [Haskell-cafe] funct.prog. vs logic prog., practical Haskell

The middle road could be Curry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry, sorry,
this Curry http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/~curry/, a functional-logic
language. I know that curry has gained a lot of interest from prolog
programmers. There are compilers from Curry to Prolog. It is a haskell 98
implementation (more or less) with all logic programming features. It can be
seen also as a logic language with haskell syntax. Therefore, its syntax is
more mathematical, rather that the ugly clause-based syntax of Prolog, that
is at odds with anything except with pure aristothelian logic.
2009/8/2 Thomas ten Cate
Hi all,
I'd like to convince people at our university to pay more attention to functional languages, especially Haskell. Their arguments were that
(1) Functional programming is more academic than practical.
Which, even if it were true, is an argument *for* instead of *against* teaching it at a university; that is what the word "academic" means, after all...
Thomas _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
participants (1)
-
Alberto G. Corona