At 12:03 17/07/03 +0100, Bayley, Alistair wrote:

This is what I've turned it into to get it to work. It seems a bit clumsy; is there a better way to write this?

...

test n = case True of _ | n == one -> "one" | n == two -> "two" | otherwise -> "three"

The 'case' is somewhat redundant. How about:

test n | n == one = "one" | n == two = "two" | otherwise = "three"

#g ------------------- Graham Klyne PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E