Re: functions not in type classes
19 Jan
2002
19 Jan
'02
12:41 a.m.
At 2002-01-18 03:06, Cagdas Ozgenc wrote:
Well can you give examples of some useful functions? I can live without id, and (.)
Well what about [] and 'c'? [] :: [a] 'c' :: Char Not functions, of course. But Haskell definitions are just values: it would be odd if a restriction applied to some values (functions) and not others. -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
8750
Age (days ago)
8750
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Ashley Yakeley