Help me prove macid can scale! (Macid stress tests results for happs-tutorial toy job board disappointing so far.)

From: tphyahoo

I don't want to be contrarian, but I guess I can't help myself. Does MACID have anything to say about failover and replication? Isn't that more important than volume? -- _jsn

On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:57 -0700, Jason Dusek wrote:
I don't want to be contrarian, but I guess I can't help myself. Does MACID have anything to say about failover and replication? Isn't that more important than volume?
HAppS does failover and replication within a cluster. They're working on sharding, but that's a good deal harder. Duncan

There's a thread at happs group about this with good answers
http://groups.google.com/group/HAppS/browse_thread/thread/1031809dca26f349
My top post should probably have been a cc, apologies.
Looks pretty likely that the issues are solvable. Grokking the answers now.
thomas.
2008/10/6 Duncan Coutts
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:57 -0700, Jason Dusek wrote:
I don't want to be contrarian, but I guess I can't help myself. Does MACID have anything to say about failover and replication? Isn't that more important than volume?
HAppS does failover and replication within a cluster. They're working on sharding, but that's a good deal harder.
Duncan
participants (3)
-
Duncan Coutts
-
Jason Dusek
-
Thomas Hartman