13 Mar
2005
13 Mar
'05
4:28 p.m.
Jeff, Perfect explanation. I got gummed up in the syntactic sugar and thought that >>= was sugar for the "do" notation, not vice versa. Thank you for the reminder and clarification. - Alson
7629
Age (days ago)
7629
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Alson Kemp