Re: [Haskell-cafe] sequence causing stack overflow on pretty small lists

26 Aug
2013
26 Aug
'13
11:51 p.m.
Maybe an unlimited stack size should be the default? As far as I understand, the only negative effect would be that some programming mistakes would not result in a stack overflow. However, I doubt the usefulness of that: * It already depends a lot on the optimisation level * If you do the same thing in a slightly different way, and you allocate on the heap instead of on the stack you will not get it either
4285
Age (days ago)
4285
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Niklas Hambüchen