On Stack overflow page Conal Elliot says:

Beware that denotational semantics has two parts, from its two founders Christopher Strachey and Dana Scott: the easier & more useful Strachey part and the harder and less useful (for design) Scott part.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1028250/what-is-functional-reactive-progr...

Any more information on how the Scott version is different from Starchey? On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:

http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1665#comment-55086

http://perlustration.blogspot.com/ Daryoush