On 2008 Aug 26, at 17:49, Tim Newsham wrote:

Like everyone else who has used Haskell for a while, I'm accumulating functions which I feel should have already been in the standard libraries. What's the normal path to contributing functions for consideration in future standard libraries? Is there some experimental standard lib that we can contribute to to "try out" for the big league?

Here are some functions: http://www.thenewsh.com/%7Enewsham/x/machine/Missing.hs

I think MissingH has served for that in the past. The official route is libraries@haskell.org. -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Tim Newsham wrote:

Like everyone else who has used Haskell for a while, I'm accumulating functions which I feel should have already been in the standard libraries. What's the normal path to contributing functions for consideration in future standard libraries? Is there some experimental standard lib that we can contribute to to "try out" for the big league?

Here are some functions: http://www.thenewsh.com/%7Enewsham/x/machine/Missing.hs

The official process for proposing a change to the standard libraries is documented at: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Library_submissions -Judah