I've actually looked down that particular rabbit hole. Here's a link to a monoid for pipes that represents a branch: https://github.com/tonyday567/pipes-extended/blob/master/src/Pipes/Monoid.hs... For flavour, the computation involves hoisting and lifting back and forth over several layers, as the various meta-physical wires cross. That was years ago, but I haven't seen anything since. It looks like Pipes is the wrong abstraction point to stream with branching. I wonder what is? On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Carter Schonwald < carter.schonwald@gmail.com> wrote:

Nope :)

And I think we are still learning how to do stream. Have have streaming in a line down pat, but streaming with a DAG or general graphs wendontnhave yet ;)

On Wednesday, September 28, 2016, Tom Ellis wrote:

...

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 08:56:55PM -0500, Christopher Allen wrote:

...

Streaming is a good example here. It's not "obvious" how to do many things in Haskell that are "obvious" in other languages. Partly because industry hasn't used languages like Haskell much, partly because the canvas we work with permits more structure.

Is it obvious how to do streaming in other languages? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.