Now I see. Thanks David and Simon for the clarifications! =) -- Felipe.

2008/1/10, Alfonso Acosta :

On Jan 8, 2008 1:28 PM, David Waern wrote:

...

Dear Haskell community,

I'm proud to announce the release of Haddock 2.0.0.0!

Great! I already tested a dracs spanshot before the release and seemed to work well with TH code.

Any idea about when will hackage adopt this version to generate its documentation?

Hmm, I'm not sure since I'm not involved in Hackage, but I can't think of anything that would stop Hackage from adopting it right away. David

2008/1/16, Henning Thielemann :

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, David Waern wrote:

...

Changes in version 2.0.0.0:

* The GHC API is used as the front-end

It's great to see this progress in Haddock. However, is Haddock now more difficult to port than before?

Haddock is already ported to the GHC API, the wiki-page needs updating.

Is there some bug- and feature request tracker for Haddock? I only know of http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haddock/Development_ideas and the first big point seems to be finished now.

There is no bug-tracker yet. When community.haskell.org provides Trac, we might use that. For now, we're using the TODO file in the darcs repo (code.haskell.org/haddock).

I like to have the following enhancements:

* Optionally show qualifications of identifiers, that is print "Sequence.map" rather than "map", "Music.T" rather than just "T". The option for haddock could be --qualification QUAL QUAL=none (default) strip off qualification (just "map") QUAL=orig show the identifiers as they are written in the module (e.g. "map" or "List.map") QUAL=full show all identifiers with full qualification (Data.List.map) Actually I tried to implement it by myself in the old Haddock, but I could not precisely identify the place, where the qualification is removed.

* Documentation of arguments of type constructors other than 'top level' arrows. E.g. T (a {- ^ arg -} -> b {- ^ result -} ) (a {- ^ arg -} -> b {- ^ result -} ) -> c (a {- ^ x coord -}, b {- ^ y coord -}) -> c It's probably difficult to format properly in HTML.

I've added these to the TODO file. Thanks, David