So what is preferred way to use packages together with script command? I'm added all this packages to stack arguments, and now it prints:

 Local packages are not allowed when using the script command

Понедельник, 3 апреля 2017, 21:09 +05:00 от Michael Snoyman :

The new script command was explicitly designed to ignore local configuration files to allow for complete reproducibility, which has historically been quite difficult with `runghc`. If instead you _do_ want to respect local config, you should use the previous `runghc` command approach.

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Adam Bergmark < adam@bergmark.nl > wrote:

...

I assumed that would work, but you can also specify the packages on your `-- stack [..]` line in imap.hs

I may be overrlooking something.

HTH, Adam

On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 at 16:17 Alexey Egorov via Haskell-Cafe < haskell-cafe@haskell.org > wrote:

...

Hello haskellers,

I'm trying to use stack scripting capabilities, but it gives me an error (and suggestion to fix it by adding some lines to extra-deps in config.yaml). However, adding this lines to config.yaml doesn't change anything. My script and config are here -  https://pastebin.com/PyRMQtqw  

Any help would be appreciated. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

---

Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

Sorry, to clarify: I meant that the _original_ error message was misleading, the new error message about "Local packages are not allowed" is correct. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:

The error message is misleading. The script command only allows you to use packages that exist in a snapshot. If you want to include additional packages, reverting to the runghc command is the right approach.

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Alexey Egorov wrote:

...

So what is preferred way to use packages together with script command? I'm added all this packages to stack arguments, and now it prints:

...

Local packages are not allowed when using the script command

Понедельник, 3 апреля 2017, 21:09 +05:00 от Michael Snoyman < michael@snoyman.com>:

The new script command was explicitly designed to ignore local configuration files to allow for complete reproducibility, which has historically been quite difficult with `runghc`. If instead you _do_ want to respect local config, you should use the previous `runghc` command approach.

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Adam Bergmark wrote:

I assumed that would work, but you can also specify the packages on your `-- stack [..]` line in imap.hs

I may be overrlooking something.

HTH, Adam

On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 at 16:17 Alexey Egorov via Haskell-Cafe < haskell-cafe@haskell.org> wrote:

Hello haskellers,

I'm trying to use stack scripting capabilities, but it gives me an error (and suggestion to fix it by adding some lines to extra-deps in config.yaml). However, adding this lines to config.yaml doesn't change anything. My script and config are here - https://pastebin.com/PyRMQtqw

Any help would be appreciated. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.