
On 11/17/07, Derek Elkins
However, to put things in motion for something concrete at all, we're hoping to put together a meeting taking place in the Portland area as that seems most convenient to the most people who had registered interest in AmeroHaskell and an easy place to find a venue. In that vein, while no plans have been made, something aimed for the January/February time-frame and probably hosted by Galois, if they are willing, has been discussed.
In Portland, we've already had the first pdxfunc meeting: http://groups.google.com/group/pdxfunc While billed as a functional programming user group rather than a Haskell-specific group, we shouldn't duplicate effort. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Chevalier * catamorphism.org * Often in error, never in doubt "I don't know whether I believe in me, but I still believe in my friends" -- Nerissa Nields

On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:45 -0800, Tim Chevalier wrote:
On 11/17/07, Derek Elkins
wrote: However, to put things in motion for something concrete at all, we're hoping to put together a meeting taking place in the Portland area as that seems most convenient to the most people who had registered interest in AmeroHaskell and an easy place to find a venue. In that vein, while no plans have been made, something aimed for the January/February time-frame and probably hosted by Galois, if they are willing, has been discussed.
In Portland, we've already had the first pdxfunc meeting: http://groups.google.com/group/pdxfunc
While billed as a functional programming user group rather than a Haskell-specific group, we shouldn't duplicate effort.
Don mentioned that. However, something specifically Haskell and aimed at a wider audience than just the Portland area is desirable. It's also a different tone than a user group. Hopefully, there would be a reprise next year in a different location. That said, I imagine many of those going to pdxfunc would be interested in AmeroHaskell and certainly it could be set up as a pdxfunc meeting++. At this point building momentum for AmeroHaskell is what I'd like.

On 11/17/07, Derek Elkins
Don mentioned that. However, something specifically Haskell and aimed at a wider audience than just the Portland area is desirable. It's also a different tone than a user group. Hopefully, there would be a reprise next year in a different location. That said, I imagine many of those going to pdxfunc would be interested in AmeroHaskell and certainly it could be set up as a pdxfunc meeting++. At this point building momentum for AmeroHaskell is what I'd like.
Oh, ok, I think I probably just read your post too quickly. So you're going for something roughly equivalent to AngloHaskell? Cheers, Tim -- Tim Chevalier * catamorphism.org * Often in error, never in doubt "...Losing your mind, like losing your car keys, is a real hassle." -- Andrew Solomon

On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 17:38 -0800, Tim Chevalier wrote:
On 11/17/07, Derek Elkins
wrote: Don mentioned that. However, something specifically Haskell and aimed at a wider audience than just the Portland area is desirable. It's also a different tone than a user group. Hopefully, there would be a reprise next year in a different location. That said, I imagine many of those going to pdxfunc would be interested in AmeroHaskell and certainly it could be set up as a pdxfunc meeting++. At this point building momentum for AmeroHaskell is what I'd like.
Oh, ok, I think I probably just read your post too quickly. So you're going for something roughly equivalent to AngloHaskell?
Exactly.
participants (2)
-
Derek Elkins
-
Tim Chevalier