Am 10/29/2013 11:06 PM, schrieb Christopher Done:

On 29 October 2013 22:36, martin mailto:martin.drautzburg@web.de> wrote:

is there a way to determine types of symbols which are not toplevel but inside a function?

Not at present without transformation. There are two reasonably reliable approaches:

Insert noisy holes/make intentional type errors: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Holes#Insertingdeliberatetypeerrors

Implicit parameters: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Holes#Implicitparameters

Holes will land in GHC to support this explicitly. I don't know what version of GHC has/will have this.

Alternatively, you can use ghc-mod (https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/ghc-mod) which, if you can get it to work, can tell you the types of sub-expressions.

Lastly, the next version of the FP Complete IDE gives you types of sub-expressions just by clicking on them or selecting them out of the box.

Thanks, that helps. Related questions: how can I figure out the type (using holes) for the symbol left of the <- in a do expression? I mean other than: main = do x <- getChar::undefined return () Couldn't match type `undefined' with `IO Char' And how about plain lambdas. This works f = \x -> (x::undefined)+1 Couldn't match type `t' with `undefined' but what if x does not appear on the right side?

FWIW, I asked about this on stackoverflow a while back, and there were a couple of good approaches, although nothing that completely achieves it from ghci. I've used the ghci breakpoint trick a few times, although it's doesn't give the "complete" type. Here's the link: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15034392/find-inferred-type-for-local-fun... On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Christopher Done wrote:

On 29 October 2013 22:36, martin wrote:

...

is there a way to determine types of symbols which are not toplevel but inside a function?

Not at present without transformation. There are two reasonably reliable approaches:

Insert noisy holes/make intentional type errors: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Holes#Insertingdeliberatetypeerrors

Implicit parameters: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Holes#Implicitparameters

Holes will land in GHC to support this explicitly. I don't know what version of GHC has/will have this.

Alternatively, you can use ghc-mod ( https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/ghc-mod) which, if you can get it to work, can tell you the types of sub-expressions.

Lastly, the next version of the FP Complete IDE gives you types of sub-expressions just by clicking on them or selecting them out of the box.

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe