Hi David, The problem is with Hackage, not with haddock. Patrick On Jan 10, 2009, at 3:38 AM, David Waern wrote:

2009/1/10 Patrick Perry :

...

Here's the haddock documentation; I'm not sure if Hackage honors {-# OPTIONS_HADDOCK hide #-} when it displays the exposed modules:

http://quantile95.com/blas/

It should, so If it doesn't then please tell us about it. We have a trac at:

http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/

David

The reason I want to expose modules but hide the documentation is because there are a lot of "unsafeX" functions I want to provide access to, but which 99% of users don't care about. The array library does the same thing. Patrick

Thanks for the suggestion! Done and uploaded to hackage. Patrick On Jan 10, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Eugene Kirpichov wrote:

Why don't you put them into a separate non-hidden Unsafe module and provide documentation for it? Users who don't care simply won't look there, whereas users who do care (for whom you are providing access) will still have a possibility to do so.

2009/1/10 Patrick Perry :

...

The reason I want to expose modules but hide the documentation is because there are a lot of "unsafeX" functions I want to provide access to, but which 99% of users don't care about. The array library does the same thing.

Patrick

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe