Whatever happened to Trex.hs

1 Mar
2007
1 Mar
'07
5 p.m.
Hi, I'd been using trex.hs for extensible records and programmed a bit using it. I liked it for what it did and also because it had very nice documentation on how to use it. I know there are other proposals and implementations in Haskell for records (HaskellDB and HList), but for the time being I still want to use Trex.hs. It seems to me that the current distribution of Haskell is not supporting Trex, or at least I can't find any information anymore about it, nor anything on the discussion lists. Installing recent distributions of Hugs gives me error messages about missing type constructors for records. Thanks, Adam
6657
Age (days ago)
6657
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Adam Wyner