Gee, complete sentences with bad spelling! I mean attack surface. Basically, its a question whether the total outcome would be better than what we have today. On Jul 31, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Michael Jones wrote:

I’ll make a question out of it:

Is anyone working on a Haskell project compatible with Tor? Library, Server, Browser, etc. Is anyone interested in such a project? Would the Haskell Runtime and TLS modules have any time dependent behavior that would make encryption harder/easier to break than C implementations? Basically, is the TLS attach surface smaller or larger than openssl and is there any data to support claims of such?

Mike

On Jul 30, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:

...

On 2014-07-31 05:42, Vasili I. Galchin wrote:

...

Haskell contributions to http://www.torproject.org .. .any thoughts ??

Uh... what?

In case it isn't clear: Posting incoherent one-liners which seem to be missing several words (such as your post above) and posts which don't seem to carry any content* (your other post today) isn't particularly useful or welcome around here.

Despite what some might claim about the Haskell community, we aren't mind readers. You need to add a few more words to explain what you're trying to say and/or ask, so that people other than you can understand.

*) Apart from vague mentions of "mutability" and two links which on the face of it don't have much (if anything) to do with each other.

Regards,

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe