
Ah; finally in a toip-10 list! Not for love, but for money..?! The Stack Overflow 2020 Developer Survey's top 10 "top paying" languages: 1. Perl, $76,000 2. Scala, $76,000 3. Go, $74,000 4. Rust, $74,000 5. Ruby, $71,000 6. Bash/Shell/PowerShell, $65,000 7. Objective-C, $64,000 8. Haskell, $60,000 9. Julia, $59,000 10. Python, $59,000 Dr. Gregory Guthrie Maharishi International University ----------------------------------------------------------------

https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#top-paying-technologies is
the link. Honestly, though, the salary numbers seem so wrong that I find
it hard to take them seriously. I imagine what's going on here is that
salaries vary mainly by location. Technologies that have not been adopted
in regions where salaries are lower will show up at the top of this list.
It says nothing about how salaries in any given area will compare.
Interpreting correlations like this is tricky.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:45 AM Ruben Astudillo
On 03-06-20 09:11, Gregory Guthrie wrote:
The Stack Overflow 2020 Developer Survey's top 10 "top paying" languages
Can you provide a link? This is great.
-- -- Rubén -- pgp: 4EE9 28F7 932E F4AD
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:51:31AM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#top-paying-technologies is the link. Honestly, though, the salary numbers seem so wrong that I find it hard to take them seriously. I imagine what's going on here is that salaries vary mainly by location. Technologies that have not been adopted in regions where salaries are lower will show up at the top of this list. It says nothing about how salaries in any given area will compare. Interpreting correlations like this is tricky.
Perl as top-paying programming language, and Bash/Shell/PowerShell as number 6 are particularly hard to believe.

Yep. But hey, why doubt good PR!
Even COBOL jobs are high paying recently.
Nonetheless, This is (real) data from a survey, from one place where language techies hang-out. Not definitive, but interesting. Haskell gets such little respect and good PR, anything is nice to see.
And I think that anyone who has to program in Perl deserves higher pay than ... :-)
Don't take the numbers "seriously", just enjoy.
Dr. Gregory Guthrie
Maharishi International University
----------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Haskell-Cafe
https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#top-paying-technologies is the link. Honestly, though, the salary numbers seem so wrong that I find it hard to take them seriously. I imagine what's going on here is that salaries vary mainly by location. Technologies that have not been adopted in regions where salaries are lower will show up at the top of this list. It says nothing about how salaries in any given area will compare. Interpreting correlations like this is tricky.
Perl as top-paying programming language, and Bash/Shell/PowerShell as number 6 are particularly hard to believe. _______________________________________________

Isn't it self-reported?
On 3 Jun 2020, at 18:33, Gregory Guthrie
wrote: Yep. But hey, why doubt good PR!
Even COBOL jobs are high paying recently.
Nonetheless, This is (real) data from a survey, from one place where language techies hang-out. Not definitive, but interesting. Haskell gets such little respect and good PR, anything is nice to see.
And I think that anyone who has to program in Perl deserves higher pay than ... :-)
Don't take the numbers "seriously", just enjoy.
Dr. Gregory Guthrie Maharishi International University ----------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: Haskell-Cafe
On Behalf Of Tom Ellis Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 11:01 AM To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Popularity?! On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:51:31AM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#top-paying-technologies is the link. Honestly, though, the salary numbers seem so wrong that I find it hard to take them seriously. I imagine what's going on here is that salaries vary mainly by location. Technologies that have not been adopted in regions where salaries are lower will show up at the top of this list. It says nothing about how salaries in any given area will compare. Interpreting correlations like this is tricky.
Perl as top-paying programming language, and Bash/Shell/PowerShell as number 6 are particularly hard to believe. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

On 6/3/20 11:51 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#top-paying-technologies is the link. Honestly, though, the salary numbers seem so wrong that I find it hard to take them seriously. I imagine what's going on here is that salaries vary mainly by location. Technologies that have not been adopted in regions where salaries are lower will show up at the top of this list. It says nothing about how salaries in any given area will compare. Interpreting correlations like this is tricky.
Measuring quality by salary a priori misses the point. If you control for everything else, the numbers will go up as the language gets less desirable to work with. To say nothing of the fact that a language survey on stack overflow is like asking a fish if it prefers Newton or Leibniz notation.

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020, Chris Smith wrote:
https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#top-paying-technologies is the link. Honestly, though, the salary numbers seem so wrong that I find it hard to take them seriously. I imagine what's going on here is that salaries vary mainly by location. Technologies that have not been adopted in regions where salaries are lower will show up at the top of this list. It says nothing about how salaries in any given area will compare. Interpreting correlations like this is tricky.
Averages are hard to interpret, if you do not know the variance. It would help if they added the standard deviation to each of the salary average.
participants (7)
-
Chris Smith
-
Gregory Guthrie
-
Henning Thielemann
-
Michael Orlitzky
-
MigMit
-
Ruben Astudillo
-
Tom Ellis