Haddock/Cabal/base bug?
Hi, I want to generate documentation for the base libraries, so I darcs get the base libraries, and a very basic (the sample default) Setup.hs, and try: runhaskell Setup configure runhaskell Setup build Pretty much no luck, but I'll leave that for someone else to sort out :) runhaskell Setup haddock First task is to remove errors about -fno-implicit-bangs, which are in a few files, relatively easy to do. After that it gets quite far (invokes haddock a fair bit) before failing with: haddock.exe: Main.all_subs_of_qname: unexpected unqual'd name:IOMode This is on Windows, cabal, base and haddock all fresh from darcs, GHC 6.4.2 Can anyone point out what the problem is, whose fault it is, and what can be done to fix it? Thanks Neil
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
I want to generate documentation for the base libraries, so I darcs get the base libraries, and a very basic (the sample default) Setup.hs, and try:
runhaskell Setup configure runhaskell Setup build
Pretty much no luck, but I'll leave that for someone else to sort out :)
runhaskell Setup haddock
First task is to remove errors about -fno-implicit-bangs, which are in a few files, relatively easy to do.
After that it gets quite far (invokes haddock a fair bit) before failing with:
haddock.exe: Main.all_subs_of_qname: unexpected unqual'd name:IOMode
Sometimes such an error is a Haddock problem, sometimes one of the 'unliterate' procedure in Cabal. Does the problem remain if you start Haddock manually, maybe on manually "unliterated" modules?
Hi
haddock.exe: Main.all_subs_of_qname: unexpected unqual'd name:IOMode
Sometimes such an error is a Haddock problem, sometimes one of the 'unliterate' procedure in Cabal. Does the problem remain if you start Haddock manually, maybe on manually "unliterated" modules?
Base is a bit too big and my shell skills are a bit too weak to try this out manually. I don't think its a .lhs problem, since the only .lhs files in base are under GHC, which haddock doesn't index when built with Cabal for the base. It does seem to invoke the preprocessor for all the other modules When I went into haddock and commented out the line that generates that error, it did work though. Thanks Neil
participants (2)
-
Henning Thielemann -
Neil Mitchell