On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Joe Hillenbrand wrote:

...

Parsec isn't as maintained as Megaparsec https://mrkkrp.github.io/megaparsec/.

I recommend checking out the tutorials here https://mrkkrp.github.io/megaparsec/tutorials.html.

So under the advice to use megaparsec instead of parsec, I tried the examples here: https://mrkkrp.github.io/megaparsec/tutorials/fun-with-the-recovery-feature....

Got a page full of errors starting:

fpl.hs:42:20: Not in scope: ‘<$>’ … Perhaps you meant one of these:

On a hunch I changed import Control.Applicative (empty) to import Control.Applicative

and then it started working.

This specific case is most likely due to different versions of GHC being used. Since 7.10, Prelude exports <$>. To avoid these kinds of problems, I've started including Stack script interpreter lines at the beginning of examples to encode exactly which version of GHC and other packages the example was tested with. In fact, I wrote a blog post about it last week: http://www.yesodweb.com/blog/2016/04/stackifying-the-cookbook Michael

I can only expect that if megaparsec's own official tutorials are thus out of sync with current haskell, then parsec's will be even more so.

Also I find no megaparsec on hoogle/hayoo

So how does one go about handling the dilemma: - megaparsec : in development but undocumented on hayoo/hoohle - parsec : documented but bitrotten

What/how do haskell pros go about handling such

Thanks Rusi

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe