Awesome! I am willing to assist with any Happstack related technical problems or questions that arise in trying to get this deployed. - jeremy On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:

Hey all,

Those of you who follow the Haskell subreddit no doubt saw today's post regarding the status of Hackage 2. As has been said many times in the past, the primary blocker at this point to the adoption of Hackage 2 appears to be the lack of an administrator.

It seems to me this is a poor reason for this effort to be held up. Having taken a bit of time to consider, I would be willing to put in some effort to get things moving and would be willing to maintain the haskell.org Hackage 2.0 instance going forward if necessary.

I currently have a running installation on my personal machine and things seem to be working as they should. On the whole, installation was quite trivial, so it seems likely that the project is indeed at a point where it can take real use (although a "logout" option in the web interface would make testing a bit easier).

That being said, it would in my opinion be silly to proceed without fixing the Hackage trac. It was taken down earlier this year due to spamming[1] and it seems the recovery project has been orphaned. I would be willing to help with this effort, but it seems like the someone more familiar with the haskel.org infrastructure might be better equipped to handle the situation.

It seems that this process will go something like this, 1) Bring Hackage trac back from the dead 2) Bring up a Hackage 2 instance along-side the existing hackage.haskell.org 3) Enlist testers 4) Let things simmer for a few weeks/months ensuring nothing explodes 5) After it's agreed that things are stable, eventually swap the Hackage 1 and 2 instances

This will surely be a non-trivial process but I would be willing to move things forward.

Cheers,

- Ben

[1] http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/2012-January/008427.html

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:44:18PM +0000, Ben Gamari wrote:

Those of you who follow the Haskell subreddit no doubt saw today's post regarding the status of Hackage 2. As has been said many times in the past, the primary blocker at this point to the adoption of Hackage 2 appears to be the lack of an administrator.

It seems to me this is a poor reason for this effort to be held up. Having taken a bit of time to consider, I would be willing to put in some effort to get things moving and would be willing to maintain the haskell.org Hackage 2.0 instance going forward if necessary.

Hurrah! After 5 years, 1 month and 7 days of doing this, I'm keen to stop. (I've been waiting since Hackage 2 was announced in the Nov 2008 HCAR.)

It seems that this process will go something like this, 1) Bring Hackage trac back from the dead 2) Bring up a Hackage 2 instance along-side the existing hackage.haskell.org 3) Enlist testers 4) Let things simmer for a few weeks/months ensuring nothing explodes 5) After it's agreed that things are stable, eventually swap the Hackage 1 and 2 instances

Sounds like a good plan. I expect there are a number of small things that still need doing to make the new server a complete replacement.

Hi Ben, On 13 February 2012 23:44, Ben Gamari wrote:

Hey all,

Those of you who follow the Haskell subreddit no doubt saw today's post regarding the status of Hackage 2. As has been said many times in the past, the primary blocker at this point to the adoption of Hackage 2 appears to be the lack of an administrator.

Yes, much of it is lack of an individual to keep momentum up and keep everyone else motivated. While I'm keen that hackage moves forward, my volunteer time is spread too thin to be that person keeping everything organised. That said, where I spend my volunteer time is to a large part directed by what other people are doing, it's much more fun and motivating if there's other people working with you. Speaking of which, I spent much of this evening fixing things, more details below.

It seems to me this is a poor reason for this effort to be held up. Having taken a bit of time to consider, I would be willing to put in some effort to get things moving and would be willing to maintain the haskell.org Hackage 2.0 instance going forward if necessary.

That would be great. So in the short term I'm very happy to get the help and in the longer term I'm happy to hand over to anyone sensible who puts in the effort. That person could be you, someone else or a team of several people. More immediately, my general policy with commit access is to give it to anyone who's sent a few good patches. Currently there are 7 people with write access to the darcs repo on code.h.o. It is of course also fine for people to maintain their own public branches (which they can do using git or darcs, whichever).

I currently have a running installation on my personal machine and things seem to be working as they should. On the whole, installation was quite trivial, so it seems likely that the project is indeed at a point where it can take real use (although a "logout" option in the web interface would make testing a bit easier).

Yes, we're at the stage where we can run a public testing instance. You'll see there's a bit more to implement and test for a switchover.

That being said, it would in my opinion be silly to proceed without fixing the Hackage trac. It was taken down earlier this year due to spamming[1] and it seems the recovery project has been orphaned. I would be willing to help with this effort, but it seems like the someone more familiar with the haskel.org infrastructure might be better equipped to handle the situation.

I spent a couple hours on this this evening and I've finally fixed it (I hope). I still need to purge a bit of wiki/ticket spam (help apreciated there). Sadly I've had to blow away the previos login accounts, but I've semi-restored by copying the ghc trac accounts. So if you happen to have an account on the ghc trac, then your login should work for the hackage trac. Otherwise you'll need to re-register as if it was a new account.

It seems that this process will go something like this,  1) Bring Hackage trac back from the dead

Check.

 2) Bring up a Hackage 2 instance along-side the existing     hackage.haskell.org

Yes, now that the trac is back, you can see what notes we have on the switchover process at: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/wiki/HackageDB/2.0 Note also that the nice people at factisresearch.com have given us a VM with enough memory (8GB) for the purpose of running a public test with the full package set (in principle it should not need so much memory, but we currently keep unnecessary package metadata in memory). So thanks to you and others this evening motivating me, I've also taken Max's latest patches to my tar package (which coincidentally I released yesterday) and the corresponding hackage-server patch and set it running at: http://hackage.factisresearch.com/ This is running the latest upstream darcs version. I have also fired off a one-shot mirroring operation. This will mirror all the existing packages from hackage. It'll probably take half a day or so to complete since there's something like 30-40k tarballs to be copied over. I'll check the logs tomorrow hopefully and after that kick off a live/continuous mirror so it'll get new updates from the main hackage within 20-30 min or so. Last time Max and I tried this we were able to mirror almost all packages. Most of the unmirrorable ones at the time were due to packages with quirks in their tar format, which is what his tar patches were aimed at. So I'm hopeful we'll now have only a tiny handful of unmirrorable packages.

 3) Enlist testers  4) Let things simmer for a few weeks/months ensuring nothing explodes  5) After it's agreed that things are stable, eventually swap the     Hackage 1 and 2 instances

Right, that's more or less it. Other details on the wiki (and if there's anything missing, edit it). You'll see that there are still some missing components. In particular while I finished the live mirroring client, and Max has done a doc builder client, I think we're still missing a normal build client (one would start with Max's doc client).

This will surely be a non-trivial process but I would be willing to move things forward.

Taking an organisational / management / cheerleader role would be imensely useful (as well as technical obviously). I can help because I know more or less what needs to be done and I'm very happy to answer questions, grant push access etc. Duncan

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:

Hey all,

Those of you who follow the Haskell subreddit no doubt saw today's post regarding the status of Hackage 2. As has been said many times in the past, the primary blocker at this point to the adoption of Hackage 2 appears to be the lack of an administrator.

It seems to me this is a poor reason for this effort to be held up. Having taken a bit of time to consider, I would be willing to put in some effort to get things moving and would be willing to maintain the haskell.org Hackage 2.0 instance going forward if necessary.

I currently have a running installation on my personal machine and things seem to be working as they should. On the whole, installation was quite trivial, so it seems likely that the project is indeed at a point where it can take real use (although a "logout" option in the web interface would make testing a bit easier).

One thing that made testing hard for me last time was that existing 'cabal install' client treats the server "hackage.haskell.org" different from any other server you put in your config files, so simulating the effect of a cutover on existing users can be tricky. If you don't know what I'm talking about I can look it up. I had a hacked 'cabal' client at one point, and I could probably re-create the patches. Antoine

I apologize, But does hackage.haskell.org being down for some hours already has something with the process of bringing up Hackage 2? Kind regards, Kirill Zaborsky P.S. Previous mail was rejected by maillist

Hi, Are there any news how things are going? What remains there to be done to get us to Hackage 2? I found this list of tickets: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues?labels=hackage2&page=1&state=open Is there anything more to be done? Best regards, Krzysztof Skrzętnicki On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:

Hey all,

Those of you who follow the Haskell subreddit no doubt saw today's post regarding the status of Hackage 2. As has been said many times in the past, the primary blocker at this point to the adoption of Hackage 2 appears to be the lack of an administrator.

It seems to me this is a poor reason for this effort to be held up. Having taken a bit of time to consider, I would be willing to put in some effort to get things moving and would be willing to maintain the haskell.org Hackage 2.0 instance going forward if necessary.

I currently have a running installation on my personal machine and things seem to be working as they should. On the whole, installation was quite trivial, so it seems likely that the project is indeed at a point where it can take real use (although a "logout" option in the web interface would make testing a bit easier).

That being said, it would in my opinion be silly to proceed without fixing the Hackage trac. It was taken down earlier this year due to spamming[1] and it seems the recovery project has been orphaned. I would be willing to help with this effort, but it seems like the someone more familiar with the haskel.org infrastructure might be better equipped to handle the situation.

It seems that this process will go something like this, 1) Bring Hackage trac back from the dead 2) Bring up a Hackage 2 instance along-side the existing hackage.haskell.org 3) Enlist testers 4) Let things simmer for a few weeks/months ensuring nothing explodes 5) After it's agreed that things are stable, eventually swap the Hackage 1 and 2 instances

This will surely be a non-trivial process but I would be willing to move things forward.

Cheers,

- Ben

[1] http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/2012-January/008427.html

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe