On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Don Stewart wrote:
lemming:
Maybe you like to add a pointer in cabal-install.cabal/Homepage field to this page.
Good idea. Duncan?
After I finished that article, I also found: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/wiki/CabalInstall
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 21:14 +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Don Stewart wrote:
lemming:
Maybe you like to add a pointer in cabal-install.cabal/Homepage field to this page.
Good idea. Duncan?
After I finished that article, I also found: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/wiki/CabalInstall
I'm trying to work out what the best thing is to do with the Cabal documentation. Currently it's kind of patchy and spread over about three sites. There's the http://haskell.org/cabal website, the dev wiki and trac and the pages on the main Haskell.org wiki. I think ideally we'd have all the user documentation on the cabal website, including the docs for cabal-install. Unless people think that's a silly idea and we should just put everything on the haskellwiki system. Suggestions? Duncan
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 21:14 +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Don Stewart wrote:
lemming:
Maybe you like to add a pointer in cabal-install.cabal/Homepage field to this page.
Good idea. Duncan?
After I finished that article, I also found: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/wiki/CabalInstall
I'm trying to work out what the best thing is to do with the Cabal documentation. Currently it's kind of patchy and spread over about three sites. There's the http://haskell.org/cabal website, the dev wiki and trac and the pages on the main Haskell.org wiki.
... and it's divided into cabal and cabal-install documentation. Though, this separation might also be sensible.
I think ideally we'd have all the user documentation on the cabal website, including the docs for cabal-install. Unless people think that's a silly idea and we should just put everything on the haskellwiki system.
For me, access to HaskellWiki is the easiest, because I have no access to haskell.org/cabal I think. :-) In general people might like to add personal comments about cabal, which is best done in the wiki. E.g. if you solve a problem you can quickly add that solution to the FAQ. I don't mind having an official "static" site like haskell.org/cabal which points to a "dynamic" haskellwiki/Cabal and vice versa, but I think another page at haskell.org/trac is redundant.
participants (2)
-
Duncan Coutts -
Henning Thielemann