Fwd: [Haskell-cafe] I read somewhere that for 90% of a wide class of computing problems, you only need 10% of the source code in Haskell, that you would in an imperative language.

;)
Off topic:
Maybe the entire space time, the universe and his history, is isomorphic to
a mathematical structure.
http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe_frames.html
http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe_frames.html
2009/10/1 Peter Verswyvelen
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Coppin
wrote:
Sure. But what is a computer program? It's a *list of instructions* that tells a computer *how to do something*. And yet, the Haskell definition of sum looks more like a definition of what a sum is rather than an actual, usable procedure for *computing* that sum. (Of course, we know that it /is/ in fact executable... it just doesn't look it at first sight.)
Is it? The list of instruction is just an abstraction layer built on top of purely physical process of electrons and transistors; I'm not sure how much imperativeness remains at this level? Not to mention the quantum mechanical processes that take place... And that are also just mathematical models... I mean, it really depends from which angle and at which detail you look at it, no?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
participants (1)
-
Alberto G. Corona