I'm more confused by "get rid of repetitive code" than by "scrap your boilerplate". On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 17:53, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic < ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 11:13, The FLOSS Information < theflossinformation@yandex.com> wrote:

...

Scrap your boilerplate

Can you write the synonyms of the words in this sentence? I think that such a method is necessary to avoid meaning confusion.

Get rid of repetitive code?

Is that what you were after?

...

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

-- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com http://IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

Every language has its idioms where a word-by-word translation would be misleading. Even communities have this, and programming is no exception. "Boilerplate" is a term from the programming community, and you simply have to learn its meaning in programming - just as the meanings of "the program knows", "bus", "keyboard", "tree", etc. etc. pp. Am 15.05.19 um 03:46 schrieb The FLOSS Information:

I think the proposed term is less confusing because the other term has more than one meaning in our language and it's a little hard to decide which one is right. 14.05.2019, 20:06, "Richard O'Keefe" :

I'm more confused by "get rid of repetitive code" than by "scrap your boilerplate". On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 17:53, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic mailto:ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 11:13, The FLOSS Information mailto:theflossinformation@yandex.com> wrote:

Scrap your boilerplate Can you write the synonyms of the words in this sentence? I think that such a method is necessary to avoid meaning confusion.

Get rid of repetitive code? Is that what you were after?