
From the guy who brought you "data in Haskell is like an undead quantum cat", I present the following: "If programming languages were like vehicles, C would be a Ferrari, C++ would be a Porshe, Java would be a BWM and Haskell would be a hovercraft. It doesn't even have WHEELS! There is no steering wheel, no gearbox, no clutch... it doesn't even have BRAKES!!! It completely turns the rules upside down. I mean, it moves by PUSHING AIR. That's just crazy! It even STEERS by pushing air. It sounds so absurd, it couldn't possibly work... ...oh, but it DOES work. Very well, actually. In fact, a hovercraft can do some things that the others can't. It works on water. It can go sideways. It can REALLY turn on the spot." Insert whitty replies here...

On Monday 23 July 2007, Andrew Coppin wrote:
From the guy who brought you "data in Haskell is like an undead quantum cat", I present the following:
"If programming languages were like vehicles, C would be a Ferrari, C++ would be a Porshe, Java would be a BWM and Haskell would be a hovercraft.
It doesn't even have WHEELS! There is no steering wheel, no gearbox, no clutch... it doesn't even have BRAKES!!!
It completely turns the rules upside down. I mean, it moves by PUSHING AIR. That's just crazy! It even STEERS by pushing air. It sounds so absurd, it couldn't possibly work...
...oh, but it DOES work. Very well, actually. In fact, a hovercraft can do some things that the others can't. It works on water. It can go sideways. It can REALLY turn on the spot."
I'm definitely keeping this around somewhere. Thanks. Jonathan Cast http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-core http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-emacs

On 7/23/07, Andrew Coppin
From the guy who brought you "data in Haskell is like an undead quantum cat", I present the following:
"If programming languages were like vehicles, C would be a Ferrari, C++ would be a Porshe, Java would be a BWM and Haskell would be a hovercraft.
It doesn't even have WHEELS! There is no steering wheel, no gearbox, no clutch... it doesn't even have BRAKES!!!
It completely turns the rules upside down. I mean, it moves by PUSHING AIR. That's just crazy! It even STEERS by pushing air. It sounds so absurd, it couldn't possibly work...
...oh, but it DOES work. Very well, actually. In fact, a hovercraft can do some things that the others can't. It works on water. It can go sideways. It can REALLY turn on the spot."
Insert whitty replies here...
nice. =) Except C wouldn't be a Ferarri, it would be just the chassis of a Ferrari with a metal seat bolted on. -Brent

C would be an engine. You have to add the wheels. If you use anything but a 75.0% mix of gasoline to oil, it explodes. Fine you guys can have Haskell as the hovercraft, not one of those big ones mind, one of those Florida glades ones, like in Lassie, with one guy sitting on it, weaving between the aligators. Java is a hot air balloon. Kindof obvious really ;-) C# is the F1 ferrari.

On Monday 23 July 2007, Hugh Perkins wrote:
C would be an engine. You have to add the wheels. If you use anything but a 75.0% mix of gasoline to oil, it explodes.
Fine you guys can have Haskell as the hovercraft, not one of those big ones mind,
How do you get that Haskell has to be small? It seems a great big language to me.
one of those Florida glades ones, like in Lassie, with one guy sitting on it, weaving between the aligators.
Java is a hot air balloon. Kindof obvious really ;-)
C# is the F1 ferrari.
Jonathan Cast http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-core http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-emacs

On 7/23/07, Jonathan Cast
Fine you guys can have Haskell as the hovercraft, not one of those big
ones
mind,
How do you get that Haskell has to be small? It seems a great big language to me.
Well, partly to be controversial, partly because.... one of those small zippy 'glade hovers would be just so much fun! You're saying you'd rather play around with a big commercial hovercraft like they use across the Channel? Let the commercial boys use F# or O'Caml, we can zip around on the 'glade hover :-) Oh, and by the way, the 'glade hover in our case is modular and comes with 100% user serviceable parts!

Yeah, but to learn how to start the hovercraft, you have to take a
6-week training class.
On 7/23/07, Hugh Perkins
On 7/23/07, Jonathan Cast
wrote: Fine you guys can have Haskell as the hovercraft, not one of those big
ones
mind,
How do you get that Haskell has to be small? It seems a great big language to me.
Well, partly to be controversial, partly because.... one of those small zippy 'glade hovers would be just so much fun! You're saying you'd rather play around with a big commercial hovercraft like they use across the Channel?
Let the commercial boys use F# or O'Caml, we can zip around on the 'glade hover :-)
Oh, and by the way, the 'glade hover in our case is modular and comes with 100% user serviceable parts!
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

I submit my own attempts for consideration: http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~mvanier/hacking/rants/cars.html Mike Andrew Coppin wrote:
From the guy who brought you "data in Haskell is like an undead quantum cat", I present the following:
"If programming languages were like vehicles, C would be a Ferrari, C++ would be a Porshe, Java would be a BWM and Haskell would be a hovercraft.
It doesn't even have WHEELS! There is no steering wheel, no gearbox, no clutch... it doesn't even have BRAKES!!!
It completely turns the rules upside down. I mean, it moves by PUSHING AIR. That's just crazy! It even STEERS by pushing air. It sounds so absurd, it couldn't possibly work...
...oh, but it DOES work. Very well, actually. In fact, a hovercraft can do some things that the others can't. It works on water. It can go sideways. It can REALLY turn on the spot."
Insert whitty replies here...
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

*> Haskell* is an incredibly elegantly-designed and beautiful car, which is rumored to be able to drive over extremely strange terrain. The one time you tried to drive it, it didn't actually drive along the road; instead, it made copies of itself and the road, with each successive copy of the road having the car a little further along. It's supposed to be possible to drive it in a more conventional way, but you don't know enough math to figure out how. Not too biased ;-)
participants (6)
-
Andrew Coppin
-
Andrew Wagner
-
Brent Yorgey
-
Hugh Perkins
-
Jonathan Cast
-
Michael Vanier