Anyone interested in taking over network-uri?

Hi! I find myself with less time to hack lately and I'm trying to reduce the number of libraries I maintain so I can invest time in new things. Would anyone be interested taking over maintenance of network-uri? It should not be much work at all. Bump a few dependencies and fix a bug or two. The package is very widely used so I suggest that the new maintainer should avoid breaking changes whenever possible*. * In other words, if you want to completely rethink network URI handling, this package is probably not the place for it. -- Johan

Hi, Johan,
I have a little spare time and would be interested in taking over
maintenance of network-uri.
However I'm not sure if I'm a right person for that. I've never maintained
any haskell package before, but would be glad to. I'm experienced with
maintenance issues applied to C/C++ but not Haskell. However, I'm sure they
are pretty much the same.
I looked through github issues; as far as I understand, the maintainer's
responsibilities are tracking things work fine with newer versions of
dependencies, fixing bugs that doesn't break source-level compatibility and
rejecting other proposals. I believe I would handle this.
Regards,
Alexey
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Johan Tibell
Hi!
I find myself with less time to hack lately and I'm trying to reduce the number of libraries I maintain so I can invest time in new things. Would anyone be interested taking over maintenance of network-uri?
It should not be much work at all. Bump a few dependencies and fix a bug or two. The package is very widely used so I suggest that the new maintainer should avoid breaking changes whenever possible*.
* In other words, if you want to completely rethink network URI handling, this package is probably not the place for it.
-- Johan
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Hi Johan and Alexey,
I'll volunteer to be a comaintainer with Alexey on this package. Since the
majority of upper bound bug reports will likely come from the Stackage team
anyway, I won't mind making those maintenance releases. And I agree
completely with keeping this package in an all-but-frozen API state.
Does that sound like a reasonable setup to both of you?
Michael
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:39 PM Alexey Shmalko
Hi, Johan,
I have a little spare time and would be interested in taking over maintenance of network-uri.
However I'm not sure if I'm a right person for that. I've never maintained any haskell package before, but would be glad to. I'm experienced with maintenance issues applied to C/C++ but not Haskell. However, I'm sure they are pretty much the same.
I looked through github issues; as far as I understand, the maintainer's responsibilities are tracking things work fine with newer versions of dependencies, fixing bugs that doesn't break source-level compatibility and rejecting other proposals. I believe I would handle this.
Regards, Alexey
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Johan Tibell
wrote: Hi!
I find myself with less time to hack lately and I'm trying to reduce the number of libraries I maintain so I can invest time in new things. Would anyone be interested taking over maintenance of network-uri?
It should not be much work at all. Bump a few dependencies and fix a bug or two. The package is very widely used so I suggest that the new maintainer should avoid breaking changes whenever possible*.
* In other words, if you want to completely rethink network URI handling, this package is probably not the place for it.
-- Johan
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Hi, Michael,
I would be really happy to work along with you. Furthermore I believe I can
rely on you when I feel the lack of experience.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Michael Snoyman
Hi Johan and Alexey,
I'll volunteer to be a comaintainer with Alexey on this package. Since the majority of upper bound bug reports will likely come from the Stackage team anyway, I won't mind making those maintenance releases. And I agree completely with keeping this package in an all-but-frozen API state.
Does that sound like a reasonable setup to both of you?
Michael
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:39 PM Alexey Shmalko
wrote: Hi, Johan,
I have a little spare time and would be interested in taking over maintenance of network-uri.
However I'm not sure if I'm a right person for that. I've never maintained any haskell package before, but would be glad to. I'm experienced with maintenance issues applied to C/C++ but not Haskell. However, I'm sure they are pretty much the same.
I looked through github issues; as far as I understand, the maintainer's responsibilities are tracking things work fine with newer versions of dependencies, fixing bugs that doesn't break source-level compatibility and rejecting other proposals. I believe I would handle this.
Regards, Alexey
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Johan Tibell
wrote: Hi!
I find myself with less time to hack lately and I'm trying to reduce the number of libraries I maintain so I can invest time in new things. Would anyone be interested taking over maintenance of network-uri?
It should not be much work at all. Bump a few dependencies and fix a bug or two. The package is very widely used so I suggest that the new maintainer should avoid breaking changes whenever possible*.
* In other words, if you want to completely rethink network URI handling, this package is probably not the place for it.
-- Johan
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Michael Snoyman wrote:
Does that sound like a reasonable setup to both of you?
That sounds like an ideal combination of a relative newcomer with someone with a lot of experience and expertise. Thanks to both of you! Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Hi everyone! I must say I got more volunteers than I thought. :) I'm sure any of you would do a great job. Since Ezra was first to volunteer I will give the maintenance to him. Ezra, if you like to have a co-maintainer just let the others know. -- Johan
participants (4)
-
Alexey Shmalko
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Johan Tibell
-
Michael Snoyman