Fwd: [Haskell-cafe] Literate programming

I understand that this becomes less of an issue when
you become more experienced with haskell. Still it will always be a good way to promote haskel-style solutions.
I dunno, John uses noweb to good effect. Things like import statements along with the function definition are pretty nice and not achievable with Literate Haskell.
I don't have any problems with LaTeX, but a less verbose solution would do just fine.
You don't really need to know a lot of LaTex to use noweb. I'm no LaTex expert and I found the source easy to read.
My biggest problem is actually literate programming in conjunction with leksah. Can anybody comment on this issue? Do you guys use leskah at all?
Unfortunately literate programming doesn't really have the tool support yet. I use emacs for Haskell development and loading Haskell code in to the REPL will be an issue if you're editing a noweb file. Currently this is the only thing keeping me from starting a large (> 2000 LOC) literate project -deech
-- Martin _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:10:07 -0400
"aditya" == aditya siram
wrote:
aditya> Unfortunately literate programming doesn't really have the tool aditya> support yet. I use emacs for Haskell development and loading aditya> Haskell code in to the REPL will be an issue if you're editing aditya> a noweb file. Currently this is the only thing keeping me from aditya> starting a large (> 2000 LOC) literate project Nobody mentioned Leo (http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html) editor which works as stand-alon editor or one can use it with Emacs/Vim... I plan to use it for my project... Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: F96FF5F6 ----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
aditya siram
-
Gour