Quoth Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@digitaldistribution.com>: ... | I have a lady friend who wants to learn how to program. I just decided | to teach her Python for practical reasons: I think when you factor in practical reasons, it makes a lot of sense. Python's simplicity and suitability for beginners is vastly overrated, but it's no worse than any of its competition and better than many. It has good exception handling and the top level handler prints out a traceback, I think that's very instructive. As for Objective CAML, it is as someone suggested somewhere in the more practical direction (I haven't checked, but likely enough it does build just fine on Solaris.) And it's a bona fide FPL, plus an interesting OOP layer. Has a lot going for it, but for me it's just no fun. The syntax has something to do with that. | So I'm thinking that perhaps I can use Python, but try to teach her | functional principles, like not changing the value of a variable and not | letting her functions have side-effects. You'll teach her to resent these restrictions. Haskell is built to make the most of that style of programming, Python isn't. It does have some of that, though -- e.g., you can't modify a string. But the first principle of FP might be "use functions", and that you can impart. Python programmers often could stand to break their code out into functions. You won't get to compose functions as you would in Haskell (though it isn't clear to me that it's a big win with beginners anyway), but Python does have the basics for functional usage inasmuch as it can return multiple values, GC storage etc. In the end though it's a classic OOPL and a rather feeble FPL, and it seems to me kind of like teaching horsemanship with an oxe. Donn