Greetings, I have only used the wxHaskell library before, but I am looking into trying one of these more 'advanced' frameworks. To serve my proclivity for QT, I would like to know how its Haskell binding, qtHaskell, compares to that of Gtk. Regards, Ali Razavi
I haven't used the Gtk bindings much, but the qtHaskell bindings work quite
well. If you've used Qt before, it should be pretty easy to pick up.
- Job
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Ali Razavi
Greetings, I have only used the wxHaskell library before, but I am looking into trying one of these more 'advanced' frameworks. To serve my proclivity for QT, I would like to know how its Haskell binding, qtHaskell, compares to that of Gtk.
Regards, Ali Razavi
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hi Ali,
Ali Razavi
Greetings, I have only used the wxHaskell library before, but I am looking into trying one of these more advanced' frameworks. To serve my proclivity for QT, I would like to know how its Haskell binding, qtHaskell, compares to that of Gtk. If you just want a GUI toolkit for Haskell, and don't care QT or GTK+. I recommend use gtk2hs.
Now, qtHaskell's development looks not open enough, still have many Qt binding haven't finish. And gtk2hs is more mature and stable, most important is gtk2hs have friendly developer will help you in anytime. :) Of course, if just want to use QT, qtHaskell is right choose. :) Cheers, -- Andy
participants (3)
-
Ali Razavi -
Andy Stewart -
Job Vranish