--- Dupont Corentin
Bonjour,
Sinon étant débutant en Haskell, j'ai quelques questions à vous poser.
Je travaille régulièrement sur des gros systèmes pour le Marine (hélas :).
Ceux-ci sont généralement fait en ADA. Je me demande dans quel mesure on pourrait remplacer l'ADA par de l'Haskell?
Est-ce qu'il y a en Haskell une gestion de la programmation concurente comme en ADA?
One mounth ago, when I browsed the documentation of the GHC 6.6 I have found a lot of stuff concerning paralelism and conncurency. They are relatively new in the standard and therefore not included in some old books like Gentle Introduction. Unfortunately I did not work with ADA - even if I know it is somehow a standard in France.
Et est-ce qu'il existe des bibliothèques orienté math/physique, avec de l'analyse dimentionnelle, des matrices, de la cinématique, de la géométrie, de l'algèbre ensembliste, etc??
I don't actually know. But the language is so flexible and so expressive so: 1) they will be soon available (don't know how soon :( ) 2) the language is good as a DSL - domain small languge tool. It means you, or I or anybody (including all my students - I hope) can quickly implement a translator in order to port linbraries. Check the national page Ro - Haskell (on www.haskell.org) for a quick impresion of how to build a simple language in one day. There is a presentation there. 3) there exist some other interfaces with modules in other languages ( C seems to be an example.) Interfacing Haskell with an other language in order to support existent libraries seems to me to be an alternative idea.
Est-il facile de communiquer par messages sur le réseau? I suppose the answer is Yes, ther exists libraries, even a small example somewhere in a page linked from Haskell-fr. I do not remember where.
Do not hesitate to ask if needed. Dan Popa (user:Ha$kell) ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/