October 2016 - Haskell-prime

GitHub proposal repo permissions
by Iavor Diatchki 19 Oct '16

19 Oct '16

Hello, I was just trying to update the `Haskel 2020` project as it is not in sync with the actual pull-requests, bit I can't see a way to do it. Am I missing something, or do I simply not have the required permissions? If this is indeed a permissions issue, could someone with access fix it (maybe David?). Probably the easiest would be to create a group with all the members and give it access to the repo. -Iavor

3 3

Process question
by Iavor Diatchki 18 Oct '16

18 Oct '16

Hello, Now that we've started with a few proposal, I am realizing that I have no idea how to proceed from here. In particular: 1. How would I request I proposal to be rejected 2. How would I request that a proposal be accepted Ideas? -Iavor

4 3

Proposal: accept tuple sections
by Iavor Diatchki 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

Hello, it seems that there isn't much controversy over the TupleSections propsal, so I'd like to move the we accept it for the next language standard. Does anyone have any objections? -Iavor

4 3

Step-by-step guide for creating a new proposal
by Iavor Diatchki 07 Oct '16

07 Oct '16

Hello, During our Haskell Prime lunch meeting at ICFP, I promised to create a detailed step-by-step guide for creating Haskell Prime proposals on GitHub. The instructions are now available here: https://github.com/yav/rfcs/blob/instructions/step-by-step-instructions.md Please have a look and let me know if something is unclear, or if I misunderstood something about the process. Cheers, -Iavor

4 9

Re: minutes from committee meeting at ICFP
by Richard Eisenberg 02 Oct '16

02 Oct '16

I recall that Iavor took notes from the podium. Iavor? > On Sep 27, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Ben Gamari <ben(a)smart-cactus.org> wrote: > > Richard Eisenberg <rae(a)cs.brynmawr.edu> writes: > >> Below are the minutes from last week’s in-person meeting at ICFP among >> the attending members of the Haskell Prime committee. The conversation >> moved swiftly, and I’ve done my best at capturing the essence of >> attendees’ comments. The attendees have had a week to consider these >> notes with no suggestions submitted; I thus consider these notes >> ratified. >> > Did anyone take notes from Iavor's Status of Haskell discussion during > the Symposium? There were a few points brought up there that shouldn't > be forgotten. > > Cheers, > > - Ben >

2 1