Hi Everyone,
I was going through https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Process#Proposals and
noticed the following:
> Ideally the language change should be implemented already, so that
experience gained with the implementation can inform the discussion
Is this a hard requirement? I would like to see the ability to pass named
arguments to functions somehow (most probably through anonymous records).
I'm unaware of any existing language extension that solves this problem.
Does this render the discussion out-of-bounds from a Haskell Prime
perspective? Has this already been proposed and considered?
Also, going by what is given on the Wiki, I'm confused about where to check
the current status of proposals that are being considered. Which is the
primary link:
*
https://prime.haskell.org/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&…
* Or, https://github.com/haskell/rfcs
-- Saurabh.
Hi,
looking at Haskell prime’s trac, I noticed that there is no formal
proposal to include InstaceSigs¹ in the next language revision.
As a teacher who uses live coding in a text editor, I usually write out
all type signatures. Not being able to do that for instance methods is
a minor annoyance.
So I guess by sending this mail I started the proposal process
properly?
Greetings,
Joachim
¹ https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/latest/docs/html/users_guide/glasgow_ext…
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
mail(a)joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
XMPP: nomeata(a)joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: nomeata(a)debian.org
