1 Jul
2006
1 Jul
'06
2:12 p.m.
On Saturday 01 July 2006 18:44, Taral wrote:
Does it have fall-through semantics?
The Clean Report[1] is not really clear on that but to my knowledge nested guards do not have fall-through semantics. The report does mention this: "To ensure that at least one of the alternatives of a nested guard will be successful, a nested guarded alternative must always have a 'default case' as last alternative." Bas van Dijk. [1] ftp://ftp.cs.kun.nl/pub/Clean/Clean20/doc/CleanRep2.0.pdf (See 3.3 Guards)