
Excellent. I'm very happy with how this thread has gone. :)
(I didn't mean to imply, by the way, that we were slow to answer the `pseq` question. It's just that as I was about to move the email out of my inbox, I realized that we might all do so, and that would be bad. Yes, a few days' time is quite reasonable before anyone has to step in.)
Richard
On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Austin Seipp
Yes, I'm essentially on-board thanks to Herbert, who I know tends to get shit done, and do it well.
Sorry Herbert - I think you're going to be unanimously voted in this time, whatever exact details we sort out (like rotating committee chairs). Perhaps we should let you think about those details and advise us on them. :)
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:09 PM, José Manuel Calderón Trilla
wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:03 PM, John Wiegley
wrote: >> Henrik Nilsson
writes: It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help.
I agree completely with this.
I also agree, and offer my thanks to Herbert for being willing to take up this role from the beginning.
Same here. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
-- Regards,
Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime