Re: Status of Haskell'?

This standardization process amounts to "endorsement of existing features" which seems like not a bad process at all. It makes the standard descriptive rather than predictive.

+1. I agree generally with Gabor's points -- GHC is in the drivers seat. But at some point we should take a look at all the things GHC has made that did pay off and that are good and make them official. I'd very much like to see that endorsement happen soon, even if it's not aggressive.