
26 Jan
2006
26 Jan
'06
9:31 a.m.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
If this seems impossible, then the function itself probably *is* complex, and its type would give valuable information, and I don't see what a programmer (or a reader) benefits from a language that allows to omit this information.
For one, because that makes it possible to load it into an interpreter and be told the type. -- flippa@flippac.org A problem that's all in your head is still a problem. Brain damage is but one form of mind damage.