
7 Apr
2011
7 Apr
'11
3:32 a.m.
On 6 April 2011 20:42, Colin Paul Adams
"Bas" == Bas van Dijk
writes: Bas> On 6 April 2011 17:34, Colin Paul Adams wrote: >> Allowed? Allowed for what? Bas> Allowed to be called a Haskell file. Well, what the report says on that is irrelevant. If I see a file containing Haskell code, I shall call it a Haskell file, irrespective. I suspect I will be in the majority.
It seems you have a problem with the word "allowed". What do you think of the interoperability guidelines as proposed by Duncan? They are less stringent while having the same intention as my original proposal.