6 Mar
2006
6 Mar
'06
8:14 a.m.
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Monday, March 6, 2006, 9:50:24 AM, you wrote:
LA> Yes, I've read the article too. And I really like the record system. LA> But an off-hand remark like that doesn't convince me.
my own opinion is that this scheme is like classes - they can be resolved at compile time in most real cases but noone do it because code will be too large. if some function can accept any records which has field 'a' then to use this function on records of different types we need either to do specialization or use scheme with non-constant access time
Yes, your opinion is similar to mine. :) -- Lennart