24 Apr
2008
24 Apr
'08
5:24 p.m.
Haskell 2 (whatever it is), does not have the goals that were stated for Haskell', so I can accept disruptive changes. Haskell' has (had?) some very clear goals, and breaking every existing program was not one of them. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Wolfgang Jeltsch < g9ks157k@acme.softbase.org> wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2008 09:30 schrieb Lennart Augustsson:
Haskell has now reached the point where backwards compatibility is something that must be taken very seriously.
Would you be opposed to a Haskell 2 which would break lots of things?
[…]
Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime