-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/10/10 14:13 , Ian Lynagh wrote:
When first reading the proposal, I thought the idea was to allow the compiler to more easily perform optimisations like a+b+c+2+3+d => a+b+c+5+d but I guess that wasn't something you were thinking about?
That strikes me as a trivial application of the proposal; in Haskell it's not clear to me that there's a significant different between the two, thanks to laziness. - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyKfvgACgkQIn7hlCsL25Xt7QCggYY7LvGcj+F8Or91931pPOQR OlIAoM0BwQt+/+MqDXGhoeIjCoBCnEo6 =Nh7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----