Re: Named arguments to functions?

Thank you for your reply. If you are interested in something like this, you may want to start a

discussion of the design on one of the other lists, or perhaps write up a proposal for GHC.

While I would like the general area of records getting better in Haskell, I don't think I have the necessary technical chops to lead a GHC proposal around this. Do you know any proposal/extension in GHC that is already trying to solve: (a) records, and/or (b) named arguments?

The proposals currently under discussion are on the `github` URL.

Possible to update the prime.haskell.org website to reflect the current state of affairs? -- Saurabh.