13 Dec
2006
13 Dec
'06
7:55 a.m.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Of course, this is not really the joy of pattern guards. It is the joy of monads, with perhaps a few character strokes saved by a confusing overloading of (<-).
Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
I don't find it any more confusing than the overloading of ->.
You mean that it is used both for lambda abstractions and for functional dependencies? True, but those are so different that there is no confusion.
You missed out case statements. -- flippa@flippac.org "My religion says so" explains your beliefs. But it doesn't explain why I should hold them as well, let alone be restricted by them.